|
Post by account_disabled on Feb 1, 2018 21:06:22 GMT 10
Hi, Looking at the world map I have seen many different regions. You can look at the Caucasus mountains and see that some places there look very similar to the Scottish highlands or other such places. Then you can look elsewhere to the fields of Manchuria and draw comparisons with other parts of Europe. The fact is that various lands look similar to each other and can have similar geographic conditions. This leads me to question why the Western culture, most notably the Anglo-Saxon British culture developed into liberalism and what it is today whereas other peoples in sometimes similar geographic regions did not? The British people had the opportunity to develop any culture they wished. It is therefore interesting and surprising that they developed the way they did. Why did they become individualist and classic liberals as opposed to collectivist and traditionalist? My thought is this. If you took a group of Englishmen and gave them land in the middle of Siberia, offered them a few cultural influences, but cut them off from the rest of the English speaking world and any knowledge of where they came from, leaving them just their language, what sort of culture could they develop? Thanks I didn't find the right solution from the internet. References: www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=138296SaaS Promotion
|
|